image description
Protocol: Scientific Protocol for Salmonid Habitat Surveys within the Columbia Habitat Monitoring Program (CHaMP) v1.0
  • Referenced: 0 times
  • No. of Methods: 56
  • Supplemental Information:

CHaMP is designed as a Columbia River basin-wide habitat status and trends monitoring program built around a single protocol with a programmatic approach to data collection and management (RM&E Workgroup 2010). CHaMP will result in the collection and analysis of systematic habitat status and trends information that will be used to assess basin-wide habitat conditions. When coupled with biological response indicators, this status and trends information will be used to evaluate habitat management strategies. This program will be integrated with ongoing Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Program (PNAMP) recovery planning efforts and will be part of the collaborative process across Columbia Basin fish management agencies and tribes and other state and federal agencies that are monitoring anadromous salmonids and/or their habitat. The implementation of CHaMP will characterize stream responses to watershed restoration and/or management actions in at least one population within each steelhead and spring Chinook Major Population Group (MPG) which have, or will have, “fish-in” and “fish-out” monitoring (identified in RPA 50.6), thereby meeting the requirements of RPA 56.3, RPA 57, and RPA 3. CHaMP was designed to deliver trends in habitat indicators and requires that monitoring occurs for three cycles of a sampling panel (see section 1.6), at least 9 years.

Monitoring Program

CHaMP (Columbia Habitat Monitoring Program)

  1. The stream habitat data will be applied in conjunction with salmonid growth, survival, abundance and productivity data to estimate fish-habitat relationships across the Upper Columbia River Basin area
  2. To generate standardized status and trend and effectiveness monitoring data for salmonid habitat in important Major Population Groups and spaitally diverse watersheds of the Columbia River Basin area.
  3. To assess the quantity and quality of stream habitat for salmonids in wadeable, perennial streams below natural impassible barriers within Technical Recovery Team population boundaries across the UCRB

Photos & Figures

Forms

<none>

Study Plans using this Protocol

The information below is retained for historical purposes. Please document your Study Plan details here.

Generalized Random Tessellation Stratified (GRTS)

Regional

CHaMP monitoring watersheds were selected to represent at least one population within each steelhead and spring Chinook MPG which have, or will have, “fish-in” and “fish-out” monitoring as identified in RPA 50.6 (AA/NOAA/NPCC RM&E Workgroup 2010). The CHaMP target population includes all stream habitats for salmonids in wadeable, perennial streams below natural impassible barriers within TRT population boundaries. The target population will be drawn from the National Hydrography Dataset Plus (1:100k scale). CHaMP monitoring watersheds will be allocated funding to sample 25 sites in each year, with some exceptions for watersheds with overlapping TRT populations. Sampling effort will be balanced across valley type (source, transport and response valley segments) and landownership since some indicators and site accessibility are dependent upon these factors. Crossing two landownership levels by three valley types creates six unique subsets of the target population, which are called multi-density categories. All potential sites within a CHaMP watershed will be allocated to a multi-density category within the target frame. Based on the distribution of sites across the categories, samples may be allocated to ensure even distribution of the sample effort across categories and to ensure statistical power for indicator estimation. Under the default scenario each multi-density category will receive 4 samples.

350 Meter

Complex - we revisit / resample some sites

9  Year(s)

1  Year(s)

3  Year(s)

4


The temporal design for CHaMP monitoring watersheds will follow one of two possible panel designs, where a panel is defined as a set of sites that have the same revisit schedule. For watersheds where trend estimation is of primary concern, a single annual panel design will be used. Under this design all 25 sites will be revisited on an annual basis. A split panel design (Figure 11) will be used for watersheds where there is a need to balance status and trend estimation. Under the split panel design 15 sites will be revisited on an annual basis and 10 sites will be allocated to each of three rotating panels that will be visited once every three years. The motivation of these two temporal designs stems from a need to balance the power to 1) estimate status of the population at a point in time and 2) estimate trends in the population across time. While status is best estimated by sampling as many sites as possible across the broadest geographical distribution, trends are best estimated by repeated sampling of the same set of sites over time. Establishing two or more panels provides the possibility to balance priority of status estimation versus trend estimation.

<none>

Control Groups Description

<none>

Replicate Strategy Description

<none>

Data Collection Methods

ID Name Type Optional Customized based on Status
4072 Air Temperature Sensor Installation v1.0 Data Collection No N/A Finalized
833 Channel Class v1.0 Data Collection No N/A Finalized
4076 Channel Segment Number v2.0 Data Collection No N/A Finalized
834 Channel Unit Classification v1.0 Data Collection No N/A Finalized
4058 Channel Unit Supplemental Data v1.0 Data Collection No N/A Finalized
838 Fish Cover Elements v1.0 Data Collection No N/A Finalized
841 Large Woody Debris v1.0 Data Collection No N/A Finalized
831 Locating the Site v1.0 Data Collection No N/A Finalized
849 Macroinvertebrate Drift v1.0 Data Collection No N/A Finalized
839 Ocular Channel Unit Substrate Composition v1.0 Data Collection No N/A Finalized
840 Particle Size Distribution and Particle Embeddedness v1.0 Data Collection No N/A Finalized
845 Riparian Structure v1.0 Data Collection No N/A Finalized
835 Setting Up Topographic Survey v1.0 Data Collection No N/A Finalized
832 Site Layout v1.0 Data Collection No N/A Finalized
842 Site Map v1.0 Data Collection No N/A Finalized
843 Site Photos v1.0 Data Collection No N/A Finalized
844 Solar Input v1.0 Data Collection No N/A Finalized
847 Stream Discharge v1.0 Data Collection No N/A Finalized
836 Topographic Point Collection v1.0 Data Collection No N/A Finalized
848 Water Chemistry - Conductivity and Alkalinity v1.0 Data Collection No N/A Finalized
846 Water Temperature Probe Installation v1.0 Data Collection No N/A Finalized

Data Analysis/Interpretation Methods

ID Name Type Optional Customized based on Status
870 Channel Unit Large Wood Volume Calculation v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
865 D16, D50, and D84 Particle Size in Riffles Calculation v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
887 Drift Biomass Calculation v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
866 Fastwater Cobble Embeddedness Calculations v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
1240 Large Wood Frequency v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
872 Large Wood Volume Calculation v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
878 Percent Big Tree Cover v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
1242 Percent Coniferous Cover v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
873 Percent Fish Cover Calculation v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
1243 Percent Ground Cover and Percent No Ground Cover v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
1244 Percent Non-Woody Cover v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
1246 Percent Understory Cover and Percent No Understory Cover v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
1247 Percent Woody Cover v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
868 Pool Tail Fines: Particles <2mm and <6mm v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
1262 RBT - Bankfull Area Calculation v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
1268 RBT - Bankfull Site Length Calculation v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
1273 RBT - Bankfull Width Profile Calculation v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
1275 RBT - Bankfull Width To Depth Ratio Profile Calculation v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
1258 RBT - Channel Unit Calculation v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
1266 RBT - Integrated Bankfull Width Calculation v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
1264 RBT - Integrated Wetted Width Calculation v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
1257 RBT - Site Gradient Calculation v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
1265 RBT - Site Sinuosity Calculation v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
1271 RBT - Thalweg Depth Profile Calculation v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
1269 RBT - Thalweg Site Length Calculation v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
1261 RBT - Wetted Area Calculation v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
1267 RBT - Wetted Site Length Calculation v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
1263 RBT - Wetted Volume Calculation v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
1276 RBT - Wetted Width Profile Calculation v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
1278 RBT - Wetted Width To Depth Ratio Profile Calculation v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
853 Site Discharge Calculation v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
874 Site Measurement of Alkalinity Calculation v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
1248 Site Measurement of Conductivity Calculation v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
4142 Stream Temperature Logger Calculations v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized
867 Substrate Composition Calculations (Boulder, Cobbles, Gravel, Sand and Fines) v1.0 Data Analysis/Interpretation No N/A Finalized

Metrics

Title Category Subcategory Subcategory Focus 1
"Channel Area Type - Channel Unit Summary Tier 2" Classification of Ecological or Geological Attribute Habitat Type (ID: 192) NA
"Tier1 - Channel Unit Summary" Classification of Ecological or Geological Attribute Habitat Type (ID: 192) NA
"Tier1 - Channel Unit Tier 1 Summary" Classification of Ecological or Geological Attribute Habitat Type (ID: 192) NA
"Tier2 - Channel Unit Summary" Classification of Ecological or Geological Attribute Habitat Type (ID: 192) NA
"Tier2 - Channel Unit Summary Tier 2" Classification of Ecological or Geological Attribute Habitat Type (ID: 192) NA
"Site Discharge" Hydrology/Water Quantity Flow (ID: 104) NA
"Area - Channel Unit Summary" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Abundance of Habitat Types (ID: 15) Habitat Type: Channels
"Area - Channel Unit Summary Tier 2" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Abundance of Habitat Types (ID: 15) Habitat Type: Channels
"Area - Channel Unit Tier 1 Summary" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Abundance of Habitat Types (ID: 15) Habitat Type: Channels
"Count - Channel Unit Summary Tier 2" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Abundance of Habitat Types (ID: 15) Habitat Type: Channels
"Count - Channel Unit Tier 1 Summary" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Abundance of Habitat Types (ID: 15) Habitat Type: Channels
"Volume - Channel Unit Summary" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Abundance of Habitat Types (ID: 15) Habitat Type: Channels
"Volume - Channel Unit Summary Tier 2" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Abundance of Habitat Types (ID: 15) Habitat Type: Channels
"Volume - Channel Unit Tier 1 Summary" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Abundance of Habitat Types (ID: 15) Habitat Type: Channels
"Slow/Pool Count" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Abundance of Habitat Types (ID: 15) Habitat Type: Channel: Pools
"Slow/Pool Percent" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Abundance of Habitat Types (ID: 15) Habitat Type: Channel: Pools
"Fast-Turbulent Count" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Abundance of Habitat Types (ID: 15) Habitat Type: Channel: Riffles
"Fast-NonTurbulent Area" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Abundance of Habitat Types (ID: 15) Habitat Type: Channel: Runs/Glides
"Slow/Pool Average Residual Depth" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Composition/Structure of Habitat Types (ID: 19) Habitat Type: Channel: Pools
"Slow/Pool Volume" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Composition/Structure of Habitat Types (ID: 19) Habitat Type: Channel: Pools
"Fast-Turbulent Volume" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Composition/Structure of Habitat Types (ID: 19) Habitat Type: Channel: Riffles
"Fast-NonTurbulent Volume" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Composition/Structure of Habitat Types (ID: 19) Habitat Type: Channel: Runs/Glides
"Frequency - Channel Unit Summary Tier 2" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Density of Habitat Type (ID: 21) Habitat Type: Channels
"Frequency - Channel Unit Tier 1 Summary" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Density of Habitat Type (ID: 21) Habitat Type: Channels
"Percent - Channel Unit Summary" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Density of Habitat Type (ID: 21) Habitat Type: Channels
"Percent - Channel Unit Summary Tier 2" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Density of Habitat Type (ID: 21) Habitat Type: Channels
"Percent - Channel Unit Tier 1 Summary" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Density of Habitat Type (ID: 21) Habitat Type: Channels
"Slow/Pool Area" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Density of Habitat Type (ID: 21) Habitat Type: Channel: Pools
"Slow/Pool Frequency" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Density of Habitat Type (ID: 21) Habitat Type: Channel: Pools
"Fast-Turbulent Area" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Density of Habitat Type (ID: 21) Habitat Type: Channel: Riffles
"Fast-Turbulent Frequency" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Density of Habitat Type (ID: 21) Habitat Type: Channel: Riffles
"Fast-Turbulent Percent" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Density of Habitat Type (ID: 21) Habitat Type: Channel: Riffles
"Fast-NonTurbulent Count" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Density of Habitat Type (ID: 21) Habitat Type: Channel: Runs/Glides
"Fast-NonTurbulent Frequency" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Density of Habitat Type (ID: 21) Habitat Type: Channel: Runs/Glides
"Fast-NonTurbulent Percent" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Density of Habitat Type (ID: 21) Habitat Type: Channel: Runs/Glides
"Bankfull Large Wood Frequency per 100m" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Density of Instream Wood (ID: 374) NA
"Wetted Large Wood Frequency per 100m" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Density of Instream Wood (ID: 374) NA
"Average Depth Thalweg Exit" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Depth: Bathymetry (ID: 17) NA
"Average Depth Thalweg Exit - Channel Unit Tier 1 Summary" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Depth: Bathymetry (ID: 17) NA
"Average Max Depth - Channel Unit Summary Tier 2" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Depth: Bathymetry (ID: 17) NA
"Average Max Depth - Channel Unit Tier 1 Summary" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Depth: Bathymetry (ID: 17) NA
"Average Residual Depth" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Depth: Bathymetry (ID: 17) NA
"Average Residual Depth - Channel Unit Tier 1 Summary" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Depth: Bathymetry (ID: 17) NA
"Centerline Depth Profile Filtered CV" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Depth: Bathymetry (ID: 17) NA
"Centerline Depth Profile Filtered Mean" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Depth: Bathymetry (ID: 17) NA
"Depth Thalweg Exit - Channel Unit Summary" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Depth: Bathymetry (ID: 17) NA
"Max Depth - Channel Unit Summary" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Depth: Bathymetry (ID: 17) NA
"Residual Depth - Channel Unit Summary" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Depth: Bathymetry (ID: 17) NA
"Thalweg Depth Profile Filtered Mean" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Depth: Bathymetry (ID: 17) NA
"Water Depth StdDev" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Depth: Bathymetry (ID: 17) NA
"Spacing - Channel Unit Summary Tier 2" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Distribution of Habitat Type (ID: 440) Habitat Type: Channels
"Spacing - Channel Unit Tier 1 Summary" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Distribution of Habitat Type (ID: 440) Habitat Type: Channels
"Slow/Pool Spacing" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Distribution of Habitat Type (ID: 440) Habitat Type: Channel: Pools
"Fast-Turbulent Spacing" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Distribution of Habitat Type (ID: 440) Habitat Type: Channel: Riffles
"Fast-NonTurbulent Spacing" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Distribution of Habitat Type (ID: 440) Habitat Type: Channel: Runs/Glides
"Sinuosity Via Centerline" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Edge/Density/Sinuosity (ID: 29) Habitat Type: Channels
"Site Sinuosity" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Edge/Density/Sinuosity (ID: 29) Habitat Type: Channels
"Standard Deviation of the Detrended DEM" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Elevation (ID: 30) NA
"Site Water Surface Gradient" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Gradient (ID: 32) NA
"Thalweg Depth Profile Filtered CV" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Gradient (ID: 32) NA
"Water Surface Gradient Profile Filtered CV" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Gradient (ID: 32) NA
"Water Surface Gradient Profile Filtered Mean" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Gradient (ID: 32) NA
"Bankfull Volume" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Length/Width/Area (ID: 36) Habitat Type: Channels
"Site Bankfull Area" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Length/Width/Area (ID: 36) Habitat Type: Channels
"Site Length Bankfull" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Length/Width/Area (ID: 36) Habitat Type: Channels
"Site Length Thalweg" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Length/Width/Area (ID: 36) Habitat Type: Channels
"Site Length Wetted" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Length/Width/Area (ID: 36) Habitat Type: Channels
"Site Wetted Area" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Length/Width/Area (ID: 36) Habitat Type: Channels
"Thalweg to Centerline Length Ratio" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Length/Width/Area (ID: 36) Habitat Type: Channels
"Bankfull Large Wood Volume by Site" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Size: Wood Structure (ID: 195) NA
"Bankfull Large Wood Volume by Tier1" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Size: Wood Structure (ID: 195) NA
"Bankfull Large Wood Volume in Fast-NonTurbulent" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Size: Wood Structure (ID: 195) NA
"Bankfull Large Wood Volume in Fast-Turbulent" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Size: Wood Structure (ID: 195) NA
"Bankfull Large Wood Volume in Slow/Pools" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Size: Wood Structure (ID: 195) NA
"Wetted Large Wood Volume by Site" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Size: Wood Structure (ID: 195) NA
"Wetted Large Wood Volume by Tier1" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Size: Wood Structure (ID: 195) NA
"Wetted Large Wood Volume in Fast-NonTurbulent" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Size: Wood Structure (ID: 195) NA
"Wetted Large Wood Volume in Fast-Turbulent" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Size: Wood Structure (ID: 195) NA
"Wetted Large Wood Volume in Slow/Pools" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Size: Wood Structure (ID: 195) NA
"Fish Cover Composition Artificial" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Species Cover (ID: 39) Habitat Type: Channels
"Fish Cover Composition Artificial - Channel Unit Tier 1 Summary" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Species Cover (ID: 39) Habitat Type: Channels
"Fish Cover Composition LWD" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Species Cover (ID: 39) Habitat Type: Channels
"Fish Cover Composition LWD - Channel Unit Tier 1 Summary" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Species Cover (ID: 39) Habitat Type: Channels
"Fish Cover Composition None" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Species Cover (ID: 39) Habitat Type: Channels
"Fish Cover Composition None - Channel Unit Tier 1 Summary" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Species Cover (ID: 39) Habitat Type: Channels
"Fish Cover Composition Total" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Species Cover (ID: 39) Habitat Type: Channels
"Fish Cover Composition Total - Channel Unit Tier 1 Summary" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Species Cover (ID: 39) Habitat Type: Channels
"Fish Cover Composition Undercut" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Species Cover (ID: 39) Habitat Type: Channels
"Fish Cover Composition Undercut - Channel Unit Tier 1 Summary" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Species Cover (ID: 39) Habitat Type: Channels
"Fish Cover Composition Vegetation" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Species Cover (ID: 39) Habitat Type: Channels
"Fish Cover Composition Vegetation - Channel Unit Tier 1 Summary" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Species Cover (ID: 39) Habitat Type: Channels
"Bankfull WidthToDepth Ratio Profile Filtered CV" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Width to Depth Ratio (ID: 43) NA
"Bankfull WidthToDepth Ratio Profile Filtered Mean" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Width to Depth Ratio (ID: 43) NA
"Wetted WidthToDepth Ratio Profile Filtered CV" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Width to Depth Ratio (ID: 43) NA
"Wetted WidthToDepth Ratio Profile Filtered Mean" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Width to Depth Ratio (ID: 43) NA
"Bankfull Width Constriction Profile Filtered CV" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Width: Bankfull (ID: 44) NA
"Bankfull Width Constriction Profile Filtered Mean" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Width: Bankfull (ID: 44) NA
"Bankfull Width Profile Filtered CV" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Width: Bankfull (ID: 44) NA
"Bankfull Width Profile Filtered Mean" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Width: Bankfull (ID: 44) NA
"Integrated Bankfull Width" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Width: Bankfull (ID: 44) NA
"Integrated Wetted Width" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Width: Wetted (ID: 45) NA
"Wetted Width Constriction Profile Filtered CV" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Width: Wetted (ID: 45) NA
"Wetted Width Constriction Profile Filtered Mean" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Width: Wetted (ID: 45) NA
"Wetted Width Profile Filtered CV" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Width: Wetted (ID: 45) NA
"Wetted Width Profile Filtered Mean" Landscape Form & Geomorphology Width: Wetted (ID: 45) NA
"Average Summer Solar Access" Light Light Concentration (ID: 110) NA
"Canopy No Cover" Light Light Concentration (ID: 110) NA
"Groundcover No Cover" Light Light Concentration (ID: 110) NA
"Understory No Cover" Light Light Concentration (ID: 110) NA
"Drift Biomass Density" Macroinvertebrates Drift Density (ID: 244) Habitat Type: Channels
"Change Detection Results" Other Not Applicable (ID: 243) NA
"Channel Unit Number - Channel Unit Summary" Other Not Applicable (ID: 243) NA
"Channel UnitID - Channel Unit Summary" Other Not Applicable (ID: 243) NA
"Geo Database" Other Not Applicable (ID: 243) NA
"Log File" Other Not Applicable (ID: 243) NA
"Results File" Other Not Applicable (ID: 243) NA
"Area of Deposition By Channel Area T-1" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Area of Deposition By Channel Area T0" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Area of Deposition By Tier 1 T-1" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Area of Deposition By Tier 1 T0" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Area of Deposition For Site T-1" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Area of Deposition For Site T0" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Net Volume of Difference By Channel Area T-1" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Net Volume of Difference By Channel Area T0" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Net Volume of Difference By Tier 1 T-1" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Net Volume of Difference By Tier 1 T0" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Net Volume of Difference For Site T-1" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Net Volume of Difference For Site T0" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Percent Deposition By Channel Area T-1" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Percent Deposition By Channel Area T0" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Percent Deposition By Tier 1 T-1" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Percent Deposition By Tier 1 T0" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Percent Deposition For Site T-1" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Percent Deposition For Site T0" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Volume of Deposition By Channel Area T-1" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Volume of Deposition By Channel Area T0" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Volume of Deposition By Tier 1 T-1" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Volume of Deposition By Tier 1 T0" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Volume of Deposition For Fast Non-Turbulent T-1" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Volume of Deposition For Fast Non-Turbulent T0" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Volume of Deposition For Fast Turbulent T-1" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Volume of Deposition For Fast Turbulent T0" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Volume of Deposition For Site T-1" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Volume of Deposition For Site T0" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Volume of Deposition For Slow/Pools T-1" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Volume of Deposition For Slow/Pools T0" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Volume of Difference By Channel Area T-1" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Volume of Difference By Channel Area T0" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Volume of Difference By Tier 1 T-1" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Volume of Difference By Tier 1 T0" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Volume of Difference For Site T-1" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Volume of Difference For Site T0" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Accretion Rates/ Aggradation (ID: 129) NA
"Area of Erosion By Channel Area T-1" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Bed Scour/Erosion Rate (ID: 131) NA
"Area of Erosion By Channel Area T0" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Bed Scour/Erosion Rate (ID: 131) NA
"Area of Erosion By Tier 1 T0" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Bed Scour/Erosion Rate (ID: 131) NA
"Area of Erosion By Tier 1 T-1" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Bed Scour/Erosion Rate (ID: 131) NA
"Area of Erosion For Site T-1" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Bed Scour/Erosion Rate (ID: 131) NA
"Area of Erosion For Site T0" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Bed Scour/Erosion Rate (ID: 131) NA
"Percent Erosion By Channel Area T-1" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Bed Scour/Erosion Rate (ID: 131) NA
"Percent Erosion By Channel Area T0" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Bed Scour/Erosion Rate (ID: 131) NA
"Percent Erosion By Tier 1 T-1" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Bed Scour/Erosion Rate (ID: 131) NA
"Percent Erosion By Tier 1 T0" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Bed Scour/Erosion Rate (ID: 131) NA
"Percent Erosion For Site T-1" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Bed Scour/Erosion Rate (ID: 131) NA
"Percent Erosion For Site T0" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Bed Scour/Erosion Rate (ID: 131) NA
"Volume of Erosion By Channel Area T-1" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Bed Scour/Erosion Rate (ID: 131) NA
"Volume of Erosion By Channel Area T0" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Bed Scour/Erosion Rate (ID: 131) NA
"Volume of Erosion By Tier 1 T-1" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Bed Scour/Erosion Rate (ID: 131) NA
"Volume of Erosion By Tier 1 T0" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Bed Scour/Erosion Rate (ID: 131) NA
"Volume of Erosion For Fast Non-Turbulent T-1" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Bed Scour/Erosion Rate (ID: 131) NA
"Volume of Erosion For Fast Non-Turbulent T0" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Bed Scour/Erosion Rate (ID: 131) NA
"Volume of Erosion For Fast Turbulent T-1" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Bed Scour/Erosion Rate (ID: 131) NA
"Volume of Erosion For Fast Turbulent T0" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Bed Scour/Erosion Rate (ID: 131) NA
"Volume of Erosion For Site T-1" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Bed Scour/Erosion Rate (ID: 131) NA
"Volume of Erosion For Site T0" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Bed Scour/Erosion Rate (ID: 131) NA
"Volume of Erosion For Slow/Pools T-1" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Bed Scour/Erosion Rate (ID: 131) NA
"Volume of Erosion For Slow/Pools T0" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Bed Scour/Erosion Rate (ID: 131) NA
"Boulder and Cobbles" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Composition: Substrate/Soil-Dominant Size (ID: 132) NA
"Boulder and Cobbles - Channel Unit Tier 1 Summary" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Composition: Substrate/Soil-Dominant Size (ID: 132) NA
"Boulders" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Composition: Substrate/Soil-Dominant Size (ID: 132) NA
"Boulders - Channel Unit Tier 1 Summary" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Composition: Substrate/Soil-Dominant Size (ID: 132) NA
"Coarse and Fine Gravel" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Composition: Substrate/Soil-Dominant Size (ID: 132) NA
"Coarse and Fine Gravel - Channel Unit Tier 1 Summary" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Composition: Substrate/Soil-Dominant Size (ID: 132) NA
"Cobbles" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Composition: Substrate/Soil-Dominant Size (ID: 132) NA
"Cobbles - Channel Unit Tier 1 Summary" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Composition: Substrate/Soil-Dominant Size (ID: 132) NA
"D16" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Composition: Substrate/Soil-Dominant Size (ID: 132) NA
"D50" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Composition: Substrate/Soil-Dominant Size (ID: 132) NA
"D84" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Composition: Substrate/Soil-Dominant Size (ID: 132) NA
"Particles Less Than 2mm" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Composition: Substrate/Soil-Dominant Size (ID: 132) NA
"Particles Less Than 6mm" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Composition: Substrate/Soil-Dominant Size (ID: 132) NA
"Sand and Fines" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Composition: Substrate/Soil-Dominant Size (ID: 132) NA
"Sand and Fines - Channel Unit Tier 1 Summary" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Composition: Substrate/Soil-Dominant Size (ID: 132) NA
"Avg Fast Water Cobble Embeddedness" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Embeddedness (ID: 135) NA
"Std Deviation of Fast Water Cobble Embeddedness" Sediment/Substrate/Soils Embeddedness (ID: 135) NA
"Big Tree Cover" Vegetation/Plants Composition: Vegetative Species Assemblage (ID: 149) NA
"Coniferous Cover" Vegetation/Plants Composition: Vegetative Species Assemblage (ID: 149) NA
"Ground Cover" Vegetation/Plants Composition: Vegetative Species Assemblage (ID: 149) NA
"Non-Woody Cover" Vegetation/Plants Composition: Vegetative Species Assemblage (ID: 149) NA
"Understory Cover" Vegetation/Plants Composition: Vegetative Species Assemblage (ID: 149) NA
"Woody Cover" Vegetation/Plants Composition: Vegetative Species Assemblage (ID: 149) NA
"Alkalinity" Water Quality Alkalinity (ID: 242) Habitat Type: Channels
"Conductivity" Water Quality Conductivity (ID: 154) NA

Indicators

<none>

AA/NOAA/NPCC RM&E Workgroup.  2010.  Recommendations for Implementing Research, Monitoring and Evaluation for the 2008 NOAA Fisheries FCRPS BiOp. Portland, OR.

Almodovar, A., G. G. Nicola, and B. Elvira.  2006.  Spatial variation in brown trout production: the role of environmental factors.  Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 135:1248-1360.

AREMP.  2007.  Field protocol manual.  Aquatic and Riparian Effectiveness Monitoring Program, Interagency Monitoring Program, Northwest Forest Plan, USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Regional Office and Bureau of Land Management, Corvallis, OR.

AREMP.  2010.  Field protocol manual.  Aquatic and Riparian Effectiveness Monitoring Program, Interagency Monitoring Program, Northwest Forest Plan, USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Regional Office and Bureau of Land Management, Corvallis, OR.

Becker, C.D., and D.A. Neitzel.  1982.  Assessment of inter-gravel conditions influencing egg and alevin survival during salmonid redd dewatering.  Environmental Biology of Fishes 12 (1): 33-46, DOI: 10.1007/BF00007708.

Beechie, T., E. Buhle1, M. Ruckelshaus, A. Fullerton and L. Holsinger.  2006.  Hydrologic regime and the conservation of salmon life history diversity.  Biological Conservation 130(4): 560-572.

Bisson, P. A., D. R. Montgomery, and J. M. Buffington.  2006.  Valley segments, stream reaches, and channel units.  Pages 23-49 in Methods in Stream Ecology, 2nd edition. Elsevier.

Bisson, P.A., K. Sullivan, and J.L. Nielsen.  1988.  Channel Hydraulics, Habitat Use, and Body Form of Juvenile Coho Salmon, Steelhead, and Cutthroat Trout in Streams.  Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 1988; 117: 262-273 doi: 10.1577/1548-8659(1988)117<0262:CHHUAB>2.3.CO;2.

Bisson, P. A., R. E. Bilby, M. D. Bryant, C. A. Dolloff, G. B. Grette, R. A. House, M. L. Murphy, K. V. Koski, and J. R. Sedell.  1987.  Large woody debris in forested streams in the Pacific Northwest: past, present, and future.  Pages 143-190 in E.O. Salo and T.W. Cundy (eds.) Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions.  Contribution No. 57.  Institute of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle.

Bjornn, T.C., and Reiser, D.W.  1991.  Habitat requirements of salmonids in streams. In “Influence of forest and rangeland management on salmonid fishes and their habitats” Edited by W.R. Meehan. Am. Fish. Soc. Spec. Publ. 19. Bethesda, Md. pp. 83–138.

Boss, S.M., and J.S. Richardson.  2002.  Effects of food and cover on the growth, survival, and movement of cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki) in coastal streams.  Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59(6): 1044–1053.  DOI:10.1139/f02-079.

Bouwes, N., N. Weber, S. Bennett, J. Moberg, B. Bouwes, and C.E. Jordan.  2010.  Tributary Habitat Monitoring at the Watershed or Population Scale: Preliminary Recommendations for Standardized Fish Habitat Monitoring in the Columbia River Basin.  Prepared for NOAA-Fisheries and Bonneville Power Administration.  June 1, 2010.

Brasington J, B.T. Rumsby, and R.A. McVey.  2000.  Monitoring and modeling morphological change in a braided gravel-bed river using high resolution GPS-based survey.  Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. 25(9): 973-990. DOI: 10.1002/1096-9837(200008)25:9<973::AID-ESP111>3.0.CO;2-Y

Brewer P.A., and D.G. Passmore.  2002.  Sediment budgeting techniques in gravel bed rivers. Jones S and Frostick L (Eds), In Sediment Flux to Basins: Causes, Controls and Consequences, Special Publication 191.  Geological Society: London, pp. 97-113.

Brierley, G. J. and K. A. Fryirs.  2005.  Geomorphology and River Management.  First edition. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA, USA.

Bryce, S. A., G. A. Lomnicky, and P. R. Kaufmann.  2010.  Protecting sediment-sensitive aquatic species in mountain streams through the application of biologically based streambed sediment criteria.  Journal of North American Benthological Society 29:657-672.

Bryce, S. A., G. A. Lomnicky, P. R. Kaufmann, L. S. McAllister, and T. L. Ernst.  2008.  Development of Biologically Based Sediment Criteria in Mountain Streams of the Western United States. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 28:1714-1724.

Buffington, J. M., T. E. Lisle, R. D. Woodsmith, and S. Hilton.  2002.  Controls on the size and occurrence of pools in coarse-grained forest rivers.  River Research and Applications, 18: 507–531. doi: 10.1002/rra.693

Bunte, K., S.R., Abt, J.P., Potyondy, and K.W. Swingle.  2009.  Comparison of Three Pebble Count Protocols (EMAP, PIBO, and SFT) in Two Mountain Gravel-Bed Streams.  J. Am. Water Resource Association. 45(5): 1209-1227.

Bunte, K., and S. R. Abt.  2001.  Sampling surface and subsurface particle-size distributions in wadeable gravel- and cobble-bed streams for analyses in sediment transport, hydraulics, and streambed monitoring.  General Technical Report. RMRS-GTR-74. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 428 p.

Cada, G. F., J. M. Loar, and D. K. Cox.  1987.  Food and feeding preferences of rainbow and brown trout in southern Appalachian streams.  American Midland Naturalist 117(2):374-385.

Chen, X. Y., X. H. Wei, R. Scherer, and D. Hogan.  2008.  Effects of large woody debris on surface structure and aquatic habitat in forested streams, southern interior British Columbia, Canada. River Research and Applications 24:862-875.

Coles-Ritchie M., R.C. Henderson, E.K. Archer, C. Kennedy, and J. L. Kershner.  2004.  Repeatability of Riparian Vegetation Sampling Methods: How Useful Are These Techniques for Broad-Scale, Long-Term Monitoring?  United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-138.

Crowder D.W., and P. Diplas.  2000.  Using two-dimensional hydrodynamic models at scales of ecological importance.  Journal of Hydrology. 230(3-4): 172-191

Cunjack, R. A.  1996.  Winter habitat of selected stream fishes and potential impacts from land-use activity.  Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53:267–282.

Dauwalter, D.C., F.J. Rahel, and K.G. Gerow.  2009.  Temporal variation in trout populations: Implications for monitoring and trend detection.  Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 138:38–51.

Downie, S.T.  2004.  Stream channel measurement methods for core attributes.  Coastal Watershed Planning and Assessment Program, California Department of Fish and Game, Fortuna, CA.

Ebersole, J.L., W.J. Liss, and C.A. Frissell.  2003.  Thermal heterogeneity, stream channel morphology, and salmonid abundance in northeastern Oregon streams.  Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 60:1266-1280.

EPA, U. S.  2004.  Wadeable Stream Assessment: Field Operations Manual.  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water and Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC.

Fausch, K. D., C. E. Torgersen, C. V. Baxter, and H. W. Li.  2002.  Landscapes to Riverscapes: Bridging the Gap between Research and Conservation of Stream Fishes.  Bioscience 52(6): 483-498.

Fausch, K. D., Y. Taniguchi, S. Nakano, G. D. Grossman, and C. R. Townsend.  2001.  Flood disturbance regimes influence rainbow trout invasion success among five holarctic regions.  Ecological Applications 11:1438-1455.

Filbert, R. B., and C. P. Hawkins.  1995.  Variation in condition of rainbow trout in relation to food, temperature, and individual length in the Green River, Utah.  Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 124:824-835.

Fuller, I. C., A. R. G. Large, M. E. Charlton, G. L. Heritage, and D. J. Milan.  2003.  Reach-scale sediment transfers: An evaluation of two morphological budgeting approaches.  Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 28:889-903.

Gallo, K, C. Moyer, and S. Lanigan.  2001.  Aquatic and Riparian Effectiveness-Monitoring Program: 2001 Pilot Summary Report.  U.S. Forest Service, Corvallis, OR. 82 pp.

Gregory, S. V., F. J. Swanson, W. A. McKee, and K. W. Cummins.  1991.  An Ecosystem Perspective of Riparian Zones: Focus on links between land and water.  Bioscience 41:540-551.

Guensch, G. R., T. B. Hardy, and R. C. Addley.  2001.  Examining feeding strategies and position choice of drift-feeding salmonids using an individual-based, mechanistic foraging model.  Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58(3): 446–457 (2001). doi:10.1139/cjfas-58-3-446.

Hanson, P., T. Johnson, J. Kitchell, and D. E. Schindler.  1997.  Fish bioenergetics 3.0.  University of Wisconsin Sea Grant Institute, Madison, Wisconsin.

Harrelson, C. C., C. L. Rawlins, and J. P. Potyondy.  1994.  Stream channel reference sites: an illustrated guide to field technique.  USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report RM-245, Fort Collins, CO.

Harvey, B. C.  1998.  Influence of large woody debris on retention, immigration, and growth of coastal cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki clarki) in stream pools.  Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55:1902-1908.

Harvey, B. C., R. J. Nakamoto, and J. L. White.  1999.  Influence of large woody debris and a bankfull flood on movement of adult resident coastal cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki) during fall and winter.  Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 56:2161-2166.

Hawkins, C.P., J.L. Kershner, P.A. Bisson, M.D. Bryant, L.M. Decker, S.V. Gregory, D.A. McCullough, C.K. Overton, G.H. Reeves, , R.J. Steedman and M.K. Young.  1993.  A hierarchical approach to classifying stream habitat features.  Fisheries 18: 3-12.

Hayes, J. W., N. F. Hughes, and L. H. Kelly.  2007.  Process-based modeling of invertebrate drift transport, net energy intake and reach carrying capacity for drift-feeding salmonids.  Ecological Modeling 207:171-188.

Heitke, J.D., E.J. Archer, D.D. Dugaw, B.A. Bouwes, E.A. Archer, R.C. Henderson, and J.L. Kershner.   2008.  Effectiveness monitoring for streams and riparian areas: sampling protocol for stream channel attributes.  PACFISH/INFISH Biological Opinion (PIBO) Effectiveness Monitoring Program, Logan, UT.

Herlihy, A. T., D. P. Larsen, S. G. Paulsen, N. S. Urquhart, and B. J. Rosenbaum.  2000.  Designing a spatially balanced, randomized site selection process for regional stream surveys: The EMAP Mid-Atlantic Pilot Study. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 63(1):95-113.

Holden,Z.A., M. A. Crimmins, S. A. Cushman, and J. S. Littell.  2010.  Empirical modeling of spatial and temporal variation in warm season nocturnal air temperatures in two North Idaho mountain ranges, USA, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Vol 151 (3): 261-269, ISSN 0168-1923, DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.10.006.

(http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192310002819)

Hughes, N. F.  1998.  A model of habitat selection by drift-feeding stream salmonids at different scales.  Ecology 79:281-294.

Hughes, N. F., J. W. Hayes, K. A. Shearer, and R. G. Young.  2003.  Testing a model of drift-feeding using three-dimensional videography of wild Brown Trout, Salmo trutta, in a New Zealand river.  Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 60:1462-1476.

Hughes, N. F., and L. M. Dill.  1990.  Position choice by drift-feeding salmonids: model and test for Arctic grayling (Thymallusarcticus) in subarctic mountain streams.  Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 47:2039-2048.

Isaak, D., D. Horan, and S. Wolrab.  2010.  A Simple Method Using Underwater Epoxy to Permanently Install Temperature Sensors in Mountain Streams.  U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station Air, Water, and Aquatics Program- Boise Aquatic Sciences Lab, Boise, ID

ISRPa.  2010.  Final Review of 2010 Proposals for the Research, Monitoring, and Evaluation and Artificial Production Category.  Part 1: Programmatic Comments.  ISRP 2010-44A.  December 16, 2010.

ISRPb.  2010.  Final Review of 2010 Proposals for the Research, Monitoring, and Evaluation and Artificial Production Category.  Part 2: Recommendations and Comments on Individual Proposals.  ISRP 2010-44B.  December 16, 2010.

Jacobs, S.E., W. Gaeuman, M.A. Weeber, S.L. Gunckel, and S.J. Starcevich.  2009.  Utility of a probabilistic sampling design to determine bull trout population status using redd counts in basins of the Columbia River Plateau.  North American Journal of Fish Management 29:1590-1604

Jensen, D.W., E. A. Steel, A.H. Fullerton, and G.R. Pess.  2009.  Impact of Fine Sediment on Egg-To-Fry Survival of Pacific Salmon: A Meta-Analysis of Published Studies.  Reviews in Fisheries Science, 17: 3, 348 -359.  DOI: 10.1080/10641260902716954URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10641260902716954

Johnson, D. H., and coauthors.  2001.  Inventory and monitoring of salmon habitat in the Pacific Northwest: Directory and synthesis of protocols for management/research and volunteers in Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia.  Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA.

Kaufmann, P. R., P. Levine, E. G. Robison, C. Seeliger, and D.V. Peck.  1999.  Quantifying Physical Habitat in Wadeable Streams.  EPA/620/R-99/003, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C.

Keim, R.F., and A.E. Skaugset.  2002.  Physical aquatic habitat I. Errors associated with measurement and estimation of residual pool volumes.  N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 22(2): 145-150.

Kondolf, G.M., E.W. Larsen, and J.G. Williams.  2000.  Measuring and Modeling the Hydraulic Environment for Assessing Instream Flows.  North American Journal of Fisheries Management 20: 1016-1028.

Kondolf, G. M.  1997.  Application of the pebble count: Notes on purpose, methods and variants.  Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38:79-87.

Leary, R.J., and P. Ebertowski.  2010.  Effectiveness monitoring for streams and riparian areas: sampling protocol for vegetation parameters.  Unpublished paper on file at: http://www.fs.fed.us/biology/fishecology/emp.

Leclerc M., A. Boudreault, J.A. Bechara, and G. Corfa.  1995.  Two-dimensional hydrodynamic modeling: a neglected tool in the instream flow incremental methodology.  Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 124(5): 645-662

Lohr, S. L.  1999.  Sampling: Design and Analysis.  Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, CA.

McKean, J., D. Nagel, D. Tonina, P. Bailey, C.W. Wright, C. Bohn, and A. Nayegandhi.  2009.  Remote sensing of channels and riparian zones with a narrow-beam aquatic-terrestrial LiDAR. Remote Sensing, 1, 1065-1096; DOI:10.3390/rs1041065.

Merritt, G.  2009.  Status and Trends Monitoring for Watershed Health & Salmon Recovery: Field Data Collection Protocol, Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, WA.

Moberg, J.  2009.  A Scientific Protocol for the Collection of Habitat Data within the Upper Columbia Monitoring Strategy, Terraqua, Inc.  Prepared for and funded by: Bonneville Power Administration's Integrated Status and Effectiveness Monitoring Program, Wauconda, WA.

Moberg, J. M., and M. B. Ward.  2009.  A Field Manual of Scientific Protocols for Selecting Sampling Sites used in the Integrated Status and Effectiveness Monitoring Program.  2010 Working Version. Terraqua Inc., Wauconda, WA. for Bonneville Power Administration’s Integrated Status and Effectiveness Monitoring Program.

Mohseni, O, and H. G. Stefan.  1999.  Stream temperature/air temperature relationship: a physical interpretation.  Journal of Hydrology 218 (3-4): 128-141.

Montgomery, D. R., and J. M. Buffington.  1998.  Channel processes, classification, and response.  Pages 13-42 in R. J. Naiman and R. E. Bilby, editors. River Ecology and Management: Lessons from the Pacific Coastal Ecoregion.  Springer, New York, NY.

Montgomery, D. R., and J. M. Buffington.  1997.  Channel reach morphology in mountain drainage basins.  Geological Society of America Bulletin 109:596-611.

Montgomery, D. R. and J.M. Buffington.  1993.  Channel Classification, Prediction of Channel Response, and Assessment of Channel Condition.  Washington State Department of Natural Resources Report TFW-SH10-93-002, Olympia, WA.

Moore, K.M.S., K.K. Jones, and J.M. Dambacher.  2002.  Methods for Stream Habitat Surveys: Aquatic Inventories Project.  Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Aquatic Inventories Project, Natural Production Program, Corvallis, OR, 97333.

Mulholland, P.J., J.N. Housera, and K.O. Maloney.  2005.  Stream diurnal dissolved oxygen profiles as indicators of in-stream metabolism and disturbance effects: Fort Benning as a case study.  Ecological Indicators: 5 (3): 243-252.

Naiman, R. J., H. Decamps, and M. McClain.  2005.  Riparian ecology, conservation, and management of streamside communities.  Elsevier Academic Press, New York.

Naiman, R.J., and H. Decamps.  1997.  The Ecology of Interfaces: Riparian Zones.  Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28:621-58.

Naiman, R. J., T. J. Beechie, L. E. Benda, D. R. Berg, P. A. Bisson, L. H. MacDonald, M. D. O’Connor, P. L. Olson, and E. A. Steel.  1992.  Fundamental elements of ecologically healthy watersheds in the Pacific Northwest coastal ecoregion.  Pages 127-188 in R. J. Naiman, editor.  Watershed management: balancing sustainability and environmental change. Springer-Verlag, New York.

NCEAS.  2010.  The Salmon Monitoring Advisor Website. https://salmonmonitoringadvisor.org/

Oakley, K. L., L. P. Thomas, S. G. Fancy.  2003.  Guidelines for long-term monitoring protocols.  Wildlife Society Bulletin 2003, 31(4):1000-1003.

Olsen, D. S., B. B. Roper, J. L. Kershner, R. Henderson, and E. Archer.  2005.  Sources of variability in conducting pebble counts: their potential influence on the results of stream monitoring programs.  Journal of the American Water Resources Association 41(5):1225-1236.

Overton, K.C., S.P. Wollrab, B.C. Roberts, and M.A. Radko.  1997.  R1/R4 (Northern/Intermountain Regions) Fish and Fish Habitat Standard Inventory Procedures Handbook, U.S. Department of Agriculture, General Technical Report INT-GTR-346, Ogden, UT.

OWEB.  1999.  http://www.oregon.gov/OWEB/docs/pubs/wq_mon_guide.pdf?ga=t

Peck, D.V., A.T. Herlihy, B.H. Hill, R.M. Hughes, P.R. Kaufmann, D.J. Klemm, J.M. Lazorchak, F.H. McCormick, S.A. Peterson, P.L. Ringold, T. Magee, and M.R. Cappaert.  2001.  Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program-Surface Waters Western Pilot Study: Field Operations Manual for Wadeable Streams. EPA/620/R-06/003, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC.

Peitz, D.G., S.G. Fancy, L.P. Thomas, and B. Witcher.  2002.  Bird monitoring protocol for Agate Fossil Beds National Monument, Nebraska and Tallgrass Prairie National Preserve, Kansas.  Prairie Cluster Prototype Monitoring Program, National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior.

Platts, W.S., C. Armour, G.D. Booth, M. Bryant, J.L. Bufford, P. Cuplin, S. Jensen, G.W. Lienkaemper, G.W. Minshall, S.B. Monson, R.L. Nelson, J.R. Sedell, J.S. Tuhy.  1987.  Methods for evaluating riparian habitats with applications to management.  Gen. Tech. Rpt. INT-221. USDA Forest Service, Ogden UT.

Pleus, A.E., D. Schuett-Hames, and L. Bullchild.  1999.  TFW Monitoring Program Method Manual for the Habitat Unit Survey.  TFW-AM9-99-003, Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission.

Poff, L. N., and A. D. Huryn.  1998.  Multi-scale determinants of secondary production in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) streams.  Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55: 201-217.

Poole, G. C. and C. H. Berman.  2001.  An ecological perspective on in-stream temperature: natural heat dynamics and mechanisms of human-caused thermal degradation.  Environmental Management 27:787-802.

Potyondy, J.P., and T.L. Sylte.  2008.  Discussion – "Assessment of Methods for Measuring Embeddedness: Application to Sedimentation in Flow Regulated Streams" by Kelly M. Sennatt, Nira L. Salant, Carl E. Renshaw, and Francis J. Magilligan.  J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 44(1): 259-261.

Quinn, T. P.  2005.  Behavior and ecology of Pacific salmon and trout.  University of Washington Press:378 p.

Railsback, S.F.  2006.  inSTREAM-2D: The Individual-based stream trout research and environmental assessment model with two-dimensional habitat simulation.  Prepared for the USDA Forest Service

Railsback, S. F., H. B. Stauffer, and B. C. Harvey.  2003.  What can habitat preferences models tell us?  Tests using a virtual trout population.  Ecological Applications 13:1580-1594.

Reiser, D.W., and R.G. White.  1988.  Effects of Two Sediment Size-Classes on Survival of Steelhead and Chinook Salmon Eggs.  North American Journal of Fisheries Management 1988; 8: 432-437.  doi: 10.1577/1548-8675(1988)008<0432:EOTSSC>2.3.CO;2

Reiser, D. W. and T. A. Wesche.  1986.  A survey of Instream flow issues in Noth America. Instream Flow Chronicle 3.

Romaniszyn, E. D., J. J. Hutchens, Jr, and B. J. Wallace.  2007.  Aquatic and terrestrial invertebrate drift in southern Appalachian Mountain streams: implications for trout food resources.  Freshwater Biology 52:1-11.

Roper, B.B., J.M. Buffington, S. Bennett, S.H. Lenigan, E. Archer, S. Downie, J. Faustini, T. Hillman, S. Hubler, K. Jones, C. Jordan, P. Kaufmann, G. Merritt, C. Moyer, and A. Pleus.  2010.  A comparison of the performance and compatibility of protocols used by seven monitoring programs to measure stream habitat in the Pacific Northwest.  North American Journal of Fisheries Management; 30: 565-587.

Roper, B. B., J.M. Buffington, E. Archer, C. Moyer, and M. Ward.  2008.  The Role of Observer Variation in Determining Rosgen Stream Types in Northeastern Oregon Mountain Streams.  Journal of the American Water Resources Association 44 (2): 417–427.

Roper, B. B., J.L. Kershner, E. Archer, R. Henderson, N. Bouwes.  2002.  An evaluation of physical stream habitat attributes used to monitor streams.  Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38 (6):1637–1646.

Rosenfeld, J. S. and S. Boss.  2001.  Fitness consequences of habitat use for juvenile cutthroat trout: energetic costs and benefits in pools and riffles.  Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58:585-593.

Rosgen, D. L.  1994.  A classification of natural rivers.  Catena 22:169-199.

Schlosser, I.J.  1991.  Stream fish ecology: A landscape perspective.  BioScience 41: 704–712.

Schumm, S.A, and H.R. Khan.  1972.  Experimental Study of Channel Patterns.  The Geological Society of America Bulletin 83 (6) p. 1755-1770.  doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1972)?83[1755:ESOCP]?2.0.CO;2.

Sennatt, K.M., N.L. Salant, C.E. Renshaw, and F.J. Magilligan.  2006.  Assessment of methods for measuring embeddedness: Application to sedimentation in flow regulated streams.  J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 42(6): 1671-1682.

Senter, A.E., and G.B. Pasternak.   2010.  Large wood aids spawning Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in marginal habitat on a regulated river in California.  River Research and Applications n/a. doi: 10.1002/rra.1388.

Spence, B. C., G. A. Lomnicky, R. M. Hughes, and R. P. Novitzki.  1996.  An ecosystem approach to salmonid conservation. TR-4501-96-6057. ManTech Environmental Research Services Corp., Corvallis, OR.  Available from the National Marine Fisheries Service, Portland, Oregon.

Stevens, D. L., Jr., and A. R. Olsen.  2004.  Spatially-balanced sampling of natural resources.  Journal of American Statistical Association 99(465):262-278.

Stevens, D. L. Jr., and A. R. Olsen.  2003.  Variance estimation for spatially balanced samples of environmental resources.  Environmetrics 14:593-610.

Stevens, D. L., Jr., and N. S. Urquhart.  2000.  Response designs and support regions in sampling continuous domains.  Environmetrics 11(1):13-41.

Sutherland, A. B., J. M. Culp, and G. A. Benoy.  2010.  Characterizing deposited sediment for stream habitat assessment.  Limnology and Oceanography: Methods 8:30–44.

Sylte, T. and C. Fischenich.  2002.  Techniques for Measuring Substrate Embeddedness.  ERDC TN-EMRRP-SR-36

Tippets, W.E., and P. Moyle.  1978.  Epibenthic Feeding by Rainbow Trout (Salmo gairdneri) in the McCloud River, California.  Journal of Animal Ecology 47: 549-559.

Torgersen, C. E., R. N. Faux, B. A. McIntosh, N. J. Poage, and D. J. Norton.  2001.  Airborne thermal remote sensing for water temperature assessment in rivers and streams.  Remote Sensing of Environment 76:386-398.

Torgersen, C.E., D.M. Price, H.W. Li, and B.A. McIntosh.  1999.  Multiscale Thermal Refugia and Stream Habitat Associations of Chinook Salmon in Northeastern Oregon.  Ecological Applications 9:301–319. [doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0301:MTRASH]2.0.CO;2]

USFS.  2009.  Stream Inventory Handbook: Level I & II, Pacific Northwest Region, Region 6.

Urquhart, N.S. and T.M. Kincaid.  1999.  Designs for detecting trend from repeated surveys of ecological resources.  Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics 4, 404–414.

Vericat, D., J. Brasington, J. Wheaton, and M. Cowie.  2008.  Accuracy assessment of aerial photographs acquired using lighter-than-air blimps: low-cost tools for mapping river corridors.  River Research and Applications.

Wagner, T., J. R. Bence, M. T. Bremigan, D. B. Hayes, and M. J. Wilberg.  2007.  Regional trends in fish mean length at age: components of variance and the statistical power to detect trends.  Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 64:968–978.

Warner, K.  1963.  Natural spawning success of landlocked salmon, Salmo salar.  Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 92:161-164.

Watershed Sciences, Inc.  2003.  Analytical Methods for Dynamic Open Channel Heat and Mass Transfer. Methodology for the Heat Source Model Version 7.0.  Portland, Oregon.

Wheaton J.M.  2008.  Uncertainty in Morphological Sediment Budgeting of Rivers.  Unpublished PhD, University of Southampton, Southampton, 412 pp.

Wheaton J.M, J. Brasington, S.E. Darby, and D. Sear.  2010.  Accounting for uncertainty in DEMs from repeat topographic surveys: Improved sediment budgets.  Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. 35(2): 136-156. DOI: 10.1002/esp.1886.  Also see: http://www.joewheaton.org/Home/research/software/GCD

Whitacre, H. W., B. B. Roper, and J. L. Kershner.  2007.  A comparison of protocols and observer precision for measuring physical stream attributes.  Journal of American Water Resources Association 43(4):923-937.

Williams, J. G.  2010.  Sampling for Environmental Flow Assessments.  Fisheries 35:434-443.

Bouwes, N., J. Moberg, N. Weber, B. Bouwes, C. Beasley, S. Bennett, A.C. Hill, C.E. Jordan, R. Miller, P. Nelle, M. Polino, S. Rentmeester, B. Semmens, C. Volk, M.B. Ward, G. Wathen, and J. White. 2011. Scientific protocol for salmonid habitat surveys within the Columbia Habitat Monitoring Program. Terraqua, Inc., Wauconda, WA : http://www.champmonitoring.org/Program/Details/1#protocol

This section displays each metric or indicator defined on the protocol that has an association to at least one data analysis or data collection method.

Who's Using this Protocol?

<none>

End User License Agreement

All visitors to MonitoringResources.org may read content without creating a user account. To add content and participate in collaboration features, users must create an account. Account holders must provide their name and email address, which will be viewable by anyone visiting the site.

Privacy Act Statement

Authority

Relevant acts include the Organic Act, 43 U.S.C. 31 et seq., 1879; Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, 1934; Fish and Wildlife Act, 1956; Migratory Bird Treaty Act, 1918; Migratory Bird Conservation Act, 1900; Federal Land Policy and Management Act, 1976; Fish and Wildlife Improvement Act, 1978; Endangered Species Act, 1973; Marine Mammal Protection Act, 1972; Great Lakes Fishery Act, 1956; Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act, 1990; Water Resources Development Act, 1990; and other authorizations conveyed to the U.S. Geological Survey.

Principal Purpose

MonitoringResources.org provides a structured system to document, store, manage and share methods, protocols, sample designs, study plans and sample locations related to natural resource monitoring and research.

Routine Uses

Used to document and share the who, what, where, when and how of natural resources monitoring and research. Users who wish to provide content, edit content and use the collaboration features of the site must create an account. Account holders must provide their name and email address, which will be viewable by anyone visiting the site. MonitoringResources.org staff may use email addresses to periodically communicate development updates, bug fixes and content to participants and to assist with completion of content, if needed. The Community feature of MonitoringResources.org supports User Profiles, which allows all site visitors to view name, email and each users’ content. Name and email of participants entering information is published via application programing interfaces (API) and shared with Sitka Technology Group (vendor contracted for site development).

For all site visitors, the following information is collected:

  • The name of the domain from which you entered our website (for example, "google.com")
  • IP Address (an IP address is a number that is automatically assigned to your computer whenever you are connected to the web)
  • The type of browser and operating system used to access our website
  • The date and time you access our website
  • The pages within our website that you visit
  • If you linked to our website from another website, the address of the website
  • This website uses session cookies. They provide enhanced navigation through the website.

We use this information to measure the number of visitors to the different sections of our website and to help make our website more useful to visitors. We do not track or record information about individuals and their visits. This information is not shared with anyone beyond the support staff for this website, except when required by Law Enforcement investigation. This information is not sold for commercial marketing purposes.

Disclosure is Voluntary

If the individual does not furnish the information requested, there will be no adverse consequences. However, if you do not provide your first and last name and email address you will not be able to enter content into MonitoringResouces.org.

Paperwork Reduction Act Statement

The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C 3501 et.seq.) requires us to inform you that the information is being collected to supplement natural resource monitoring metadata, to promote publicly accessible documentation of monitoring projects, and support coordination and integration of monitoring efforts. Use of the MonitoringResources.org tools is voluntary. Use of this website is estimated to be about 1 hour per response. A Federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Comments regarding this collection of information should be directed to: Bureau Clearance officer, U.S. Geological Survey, . OMB Control Number 1090-0011 Expires 10/31/2021.